This is a talk board of FredCat100, feel free to discuss anything that include in this board.

The Laws of Rescue Kitty Please do the following actions: 1. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes before click Publish Button. 2. Unless you have same thought as other users, please click the edit on the topic you were about to discussing and add your respond/comment under the other former comments. 3. Do not change the former comments or names except for myself. 4. Do not using the inferior languages toward each other, as in the insult of the names. 5. Forbidden the action of Spams, Trolls or Vandalize - Otherwise; they will be remove from the article. 6. If you have any questions about the Judge Rulings that you are having conflict, just ask me here. 7. If I leave you a message on your talk page, I expect replies there. If you reply here, I'll copy your reply back to the original message. This keeps discussions grouped in one place, making it much easier to follow them in the future. 8. If you leave me a message here, you should watch my talk page for replies. If you'd like me to reply elsewhere, or to drop you a note when I reply, please let me know. If you wished to questioning anything that included me, I am apologize but to redirect your questions to certain Users that I trusted and believed: Deltaneos: If you have any problem with the site or other user after some struggling, you can ask this user and he will talk it over easily. But remember that he's not siding with anyone that easily. Cheesy: If you're having a post issues - like not understanding what was going on with the site, beside the conflict that you should discussing with Deltaneos (Edit-Warring, etc.) - this user is good person to help you get around with, such as upload the image, create the article base on Manga. DinoGuy: This user has an useful power to help you to recognizing the codes and blogs details if you need to custom-making your articles and stuffs in big color and pony-ish looks. Just ask him specify what you need and he will blanket you a nice set of images you needed. ATEM: If you need to solving the conflict of rulings and card combine, this user would be wonderful choice to pick out - he rarely misread but he could get onto it if you explained the situation to him clearly and be sure to including the details. Resk: If you need to gain a deck recipe - ask this user as she could set up the camp over your place and magically give you a deck that nobody can pulling out. Just give her an exact theme and ace card, then you're good. If anything else, leave me a message

Information from Ultimate Kuriboh Edit

Card ErratasEdit

Could you check the current spoiler list for Battle Pack 2: War of the Giants? A lot of the recently spoiled cards have errata changes (except for the ones at the very bottom, as they don't have pictures yet). And some of these errata changes might be subtle, like "Dark Valkyria". The solution? "to" --> "then" --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 04:18, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Ah, must had missing it - half-sleepy at that time I reverted it. --iFredCat 10:04, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

You still sleepy? Could you check the rest of the errata pages of the cards going to be released in Battle Pack 2? --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 20:30, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

My mind does, but not my instinct. And soon, I will - I am eating dinner now. --iFredCat 21:03, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

That must be an incredibly long dinner. When you're finished eating, perhaps Card Errata:Phantom Beast Rock-Lizard too? --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 01:14, May 27, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, sorry - seemed like I got trapped in Time Frame for 24 hours. But yea, I done it just now. And fixed Phantom Beast Rock-Lizard as you done spoke it. Also, I completed all other cards that was listing in Battle Pack 2. --iFredCat 01:21, May 27, 2013 (UTC)

Card ArtworksEdit

"Hero Ring". --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 23:40, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

Done and done. --iFredCat 00:01, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Call of the Haunted's Errata Edit

There were a change between "the" and "that" =). Btw, how to undo any edite, I just try it but nothing happen!! --Dlamash (talk • contribs) 15:16, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

Fixed - I understand that it's hard to do the undo and stuffs. First, click on History of that article, and click on "Undo" of the first line of all those edits and you can revert it back to normal. But be sure to remember that it don't work with old edits (second or below). And you can also undoing almost all edits that was vandalism or such to not be there, select the blue dot on left (which was lower than the one on right) then click "Compare select revisions" then click on "Undo" on the right details, that will reverting all way back to the one you wish to "reset" the page back to normal, but again, any old version (the one with right dot) wouldn't give you permission to do that as well.

TL:DR; Let's do this in steps...

Step 1 -

Step 2 - Click (undo) at end of the line up above, then review anything you wanted it to be and also you can editing it in your own way to perfect it. The Edit Box is just below the details of "Latest View" and "Your View" (if it was long list, then scroll down if you have to)

Step 3 - Once you are settle with the current edit, be sure to preview it before go ahead and "save" the page (I often made mistake with <del></del> and <ins></ins> over time) to see if it's perfectly good for you to save it.

For long load of vandalism (multiple edits, etc.), then do this step instead

Step 1 - Just similar same to above, but be sure to look at two blue dots (identify to "multiple answer choice dot", you got the draft); there are many empty dots below the lit one. You can select one of them to set the "Compare select revisions".

Step 2 - Click on "Compare Select Revisions" above the whole list of user edits, which will bring you to the same result as you were "undoing" the page, but with compare difference instead.

Step 3 - If you're make a right choice, then you can click on (undo) next to the vandalism version (on right), and it will magically switch the position of both selections that you chose.

Step 4 - Do same as Step 2 and 3 in single Undo above, and if you are satisfy with it, Preview it and Save it after you clean it up.

--iFredCat 16:53, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks fred Fred, that was very useful. --Dlamash (talk • contribs) 18:38, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. Tried my best to tutor you how - and no one even teaching me to do that. --iFredCat 18:39, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

Jester LordEdit

SALUTATIONS, FREDCAT!!

Sorry, I sincerely hope I didn't piss you off! ={

I knew I removed that trivia point earlier but ChaosGallade "reminded" me that per policy on this Wikia, card effect-related trivia is no longer needed unless it is intentional. (i.e. "Primal Seed" and the brand-new "Chaotic Seed", which is an intentional relationship.) I've seen similar reverts from other users regarding this some time ago and while I don't know the exacts about those, I do know that if that's the case, then what ChaosGallade told me WAS IN FACT, true. Hence, I dropped the point from "Jester Lord" in question because those appeared to only be similar card effects WITHOUT other relationships. The policy makes sense if you ask me, given the fact that as more booster sets come out with brand new cards, the pool of similar effects (whether intentional or not) will continue to inflate.

Again I'm sorry, I DO NOT wanna cause any trouble with anyone here!! --ARCADIASSCHOLARLY 16:53, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

I only ask if you wish to remove that obviously and pointless trivia, then throw the line that included "Krebons" out as well. They both are known as pointless and too obviously to know the difference. But if you only wish to remove one line, then stop be silly and go erase other line as well. Last line in that Trivia is just perfectly fine to me - which is very important whilst the first two are not. --iFredCat 16:57, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the response, I suppose I'm glad that there's no hard feelings (I hope...)

You know, I think the Trivia point regarding "Krebons"'s pose could be an exception, albeit NOT the rule, as I have just got done scrutinizing both card's artworks and their poses do in fact, look very similar. I mean, I haven't seen reverts regarding similar artworks before but I guess in theory, the same could go for card artworks too, even though the sky is WAY more the limit with card artworks than card effects (in other words, odds of the pool of similar artworks in the near future increasing are probably MUCH LESS than seeing similar card effects later because that is the beauty of art--variety!! =3 )

Nevertheless, I'll remove the "Krebons" point anyway, especially if you insist--at "worst," this Wikia is SO DAMN powerful that we can all revert edits @ will!! --ARCADIASSCHOLARLY 17:15, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

It's unnecessary to create new topic while they both are in same discussion - so deleted "second topic". I am aware that they possessed the same position, but that's nonsense anyways, like you said. --iFredCat 17:18, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Warrior version of Felgrand Edit

Shhhh FredCat. No worries, only dreams now. (Just leave the issue alone. I'm involving myself in stuff that I understand and leaving myself out of stuff I don't. As such, I know his alt IP was banned, but they have a valid point regarding the rename.) --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 22:02, June 17, 2013 (UTC)