Errata Logical Edit

I put the bold in both box (Lore 0 and Lore 1) so many viewers could be able to tell exact where they are changed from and to. What you did was one-side supporting, which I just don't want to see. Well, it's best to do that way rather than your habit, alright? Thank you. --iFredCat 21:51, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Sure, thanks for noticing me this. I will remind these details in my future errata's, if any. (I will also correct some erratas I created today, in the following days.) Just let me finish this occupation I started about SDWA errata's, if you don't mind. :) --Brunjox (talk • contribs) 21:58, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. If there are extra changes, like Lore 1 to Lore 2 - using italic just same way you used Bold on Lore 0 to Lore 1, so we can tell the difference. I am now retired Errata Fixer - so have fun. --iFredCat 22:16, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, as you anticipated my second question about Lore 1/2. But here comes my third question. What about further errata's? As you know, some cards have more than 1 or 2 errata's - e.g. I noticed that "Grandmaster" had 3. How do you point the third card's changes out? I have used the unerlined style for now... Tell me if it's OK, you have way more experience than me in errata's. --Brunjox (talk • contribs) 13:04, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Normal, I would using both Bold/Italic for Lore2 to Lore3, but you got better idea so I let that slip. Keep up a good work, friend. --iFredCat 13:07, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you again very much for your piece of advice. I will try my better. :) --Brunjox (talk • contribs) 13:40, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Sure, just take it slowly and look closely - that's where other user who took my place year ago did not learning well. --iFredCat 14:42, July 2, 2012 (UTC)